From the Webike Community's My Bike, the "Owner Review Summary" introduces various motorcycles based on the voices of owners who actually ride or have ridden them. This time, here's what the owners have to say about YAMAHA「MT-25」.
To be honest, the Yamaha "MT-25" is this kind of bike!
The MT-25 was introduced in 2015 as a naked model of the YZF-R25. It was launched one year after the YZF-R25. If I write that, you might think that it is a naked version of the YZF-R25, a dress-up model, right? You might think that this is the case, but it is not.
Development of the MT-25 began at the same time as the full-cowl YZF-R25. The chassis of the MT-25 and the YZF-R25 were developed while taking into account the different characters of the two vehicles. This means that the MT-25 was also planned from the early stages of design.
The biggest difference between the YZF-R25 and MT-25 is the handlebar position. In contrast to the YZF-R25 with separate handlebars, the MT-25 has bar handlebars and an upright, more comfortable position.
Is that all there is to it? You might think so, but when you ride it, you'll see a big difference. Whereas the YZF-R25 has a more 'aggressive' character on mountain passes, the MT-25 has been built in such a way that its handling qualities are evident even at low speeds, such as when turning at intersections. The MT-25 is more user-friendly in city traffic, especially when turning left and right, and when stop-and-go traffic is repeated.
The MT-25 underwent a major model change in 2020, with more sporting features such as an inverted front fork, but the correlative character of easy and comfortable city riding to the YZF-R25 remains unchanged in the current model.
How do Webike users feel about the MT-25?
MT-25
Average price of the new model: (approx.) 4194 USD
Used model price: (approx.) 2903 USD
Number of reviews: 35
※ Data as of 15 January 2024
Average owner satisfaction is 3.85 out of 5 (410 people rated)
It should be noted that the ratings for handling, fuel efficiency, riding, and looks exceed 4 points. It also scores over 3.8 points in five categories, excluding loa dability, and can be said to be a model with a high level of overall satisfaction.
On the other hand, loadability is rated low, and users who want to carry more luggage seem to cover the shortfall by installing a top case or side bags.
MT-25, Quick Summary
Advantage
- Easy to maneuver and, above all, easy to turn.
- Lightweight and easy to maneuver.
- Better fuel economy than expected.
- Easy to ride, even for beginners.
Disadvantage
- It's a 250, so there's no torque.
- Vibrations numb the hands when the revs go up.
- Can't carry much luggage at all.
- Feels cheap in places
MT-25 Owner's Voice
Here are some of the most impressive voices among the many reviews.
Gen. (2022 Model)
Motive for purchase, intended use, and comparative models | Replaced an early MT-09 model as I am more of a leisurely rider. I considered the CL250 and V-Strom but decided on the MT-25 because I thought I was not ready for a single cylinder or adventure. |
---|---|
Advantages/Satisfactory points | Tired of the MT-09 and went to the MT-25. The main use is touring within 150 km one way. It is light has excellent foot grounding, and can be moved backward and forwards in a single stride, so there is virtually no need to get off and push and pull. In a straight line, it's scary, with a feeling of absolute power like an 09! It doesn't feel like a 09, but it's not too slow either! It doesn't feel too slow either. It's just right. You can ride in a rhythm on the mountain passes and it's a lot of fun. This is about right for an old man. I honestly think the look of the bike is cool because it has a massive feel to it, whether it suits an old man or not. The cyan wheels are nice too - the tank (which is a cover) is bigger than the 09, so I don't think you'll be disappointed if you switch from a bigger bike for a view looking down when you get on. |
Disadvantages/Dissatisfactory points | This can't be helped, but there is no load capacity at all. You wonder where you can even put your documents. And the same goes for the 09. Helmet holders are not attached to the outside and I would have liked them to be standard equipment. The mirror turner was missing due to cost reductions. Previous models seemed to have them. If you're changing after riding a bigger car, you might feel that the front brake doesn't work. It doesn't stop! It's not that it doesn't stop, but that it doesn't work as well as it should. |
Advice for prospective buyers | If you're tired of the big ones, or if it's your first car anyway, you can't go wrong. It's best for those who want to take it easy - and ride a bit. |
Un jū-nen furi no ritānraidā (2021 Model)
Motive for purchase, intended use, and comparative models | Because I wanted to ride an MT bike for the first time in 20 years. Because I have almost no opportunity to use highways to tour from town riding down the road in the neighborhood, I compared the candidates with Kawasaki's Z or Yamaha's MT, although the minimum requirement was a lightweight naked bike with ABS under 400cc. In the end, the MT outperformed in terms of design and position, and I decided on the 250 due to maintenance costs and availability. |
---|---|
Advantages/Satisfactory points | It's a design that you may or may not like, but personally, it was love at first sight and I have no complaints about the looks, the lightness of the bodywork, the footprint, and the handling. |
Disadvantages/Dissatisfactory points | After all, it is a 250, so the lack of torque is not an issue. Also, when you turn the engine a little, you can feel the vibration of the handlebars, so if you ride for a long time, your hands might become numb. Also, there is no load-carrying capacity, so measures such as a seat bag are essential. As a bonus, the indicator switch and horn button are close together, so if you are not careful with winter gloves, you might press them together and sound the horn. |
Taiga (2017 Model)
Motive for purchase, intended use, and comparative models | I was looking for a bike that I could shop on, that was OK for long trips and had a transmission. I was attracted by the look of the authentic exterior. I am now using it for everyday use with a Givi top case as it is mainly for shopping. |
---|---|
Advantages/Satisfactory points | It is great fun to drive down the road at about 60 km/h. It can be ridden in higher gears for a leisurely ride, or in lower gears for a brisk ride. It has good foot grounding, so it's safe for everyday use by short-legged riders like me. |
Disadvantages/Dissatisfactory points | It has almost no load capacity, so you will need a rucksack on your back or a top case or seat bag when you are not day-touring. In terms of design, you can either accept the odd-shaped headlight, which divides preferences, or you can choose a round-eyed customization. |
Advice for prospective buyers | The two-cylinder engine has little vibration and a good heartbeat. The riding experience is still a little lacking, but there are plenty of external parts so you can enjoy customizing the car to your liking. I don't know about the past repair history because I bought it second-hand, but the mileage is over 42,000 km and there are no problems at all. |
Check out MT-25's competitors
Domestic 250cc models have appeared in recent years in a variety of engine formats - single-cylinder, two-cylinder and four-cylinder - but the MT-25 (JPY 632,500), a model with the same two-cylinder parallel twin engine, is priced close and is easy to compare.
Specific model names include the V-Strom 250 (¥646,800) and GSX250R (from ¥602,800) for Suzuki.
For Kawasaki, the Z250 (682,000 yen) and Ninja 250 (704,000 yen).
Honda's CBR250RR (JPY 869,000).
These are likely rivals with parallel-twin engines, but the full-cowl models are slightly more expensive than the naked models.
Of these, only the Honda CBR250RR jumps out at a higher price, but the class-leading luxury features such as electronic throttle and traction control and radial tires on this model have led to such a price difference.
And if we talk about price, the MT-03 (JPY 687,500), which has a 320cc engine in a common chassis and belongs to the displacement range one class higher (inspection required), has a price difference of JPY 55,000, which may seem surprisingly reasonable after knowing the prices of its rivals.
Now, if you are interested in the reviews of your competitors, check here!
※ Average owner satisfaction and number of reviews as of 15 January 2024.
Suzuki Vstrom 250
Average Owner Satisfaction:4.15 (409 people rated)
Average price of new model: (approx.) 3689 USD
Average price of used model: (approx.) 3279 USD
Number of reviews: 65
SUZUKI GSX250R
Average Owner Satisfaction: 3.85 (385 people rated)
Average price of new model: (approx.) 3511 USD
Average price of used model: (approx.) 2570 USD
Number of reviews: 42
KAWASAKI Z250
Average Owner Satisfaction:3.80 (349 people rated)
Average price of new model: (approx.) 4308 USD
Average price of used model: (approx.) 2717 USD
Number of reviews: 40
KAWASAKI Ninja 250
Average Owner Satisfaction: 3.87 (1,019 people rated)
Average price of new model: (approx.) 4453 USD
Average price of used model: (approx.) 3040 USD
Number of reviews: 111
HONDA CBR250RR
Average Owner Satisfaction: 3.85 (996 people rated)
Average price of new model: (approx.) 5616 USD
Average price of used model: (approx.) 4153 USD
Number of reviews: 66
YAMAHA MT-03
Average Owner Satisfaction: 3.92 (204 people rated)
Average price of new model: (approx.) 4494 USD
Average price of used model: (approx.) 2952 USD
Number of reviews: 27